Tweeted and poked into submission6 Apr 2008

Found in: Web Apps, Web in General

Posted at: 5:23 PM

It almost seems as if we are creating information merely for the sake of creating new ways to share and manage it.

I keep waiting for the backlash. The people will rise up and say “Enough! My brain can’t handle any more information! I don’t care that you just had a bean burrito, much less do I want a little bird to tweet that fact to me.” Instead, we keep getting more and more status, blogging, micro-blogging, favorites, currently-listening-to and currently-reading online apps—almost every day, it seems. Now, instead of examining our need to know EVERYTHING ALL THE TIME, we’re inventing ways to manage that information. Enter FriendFeed and it’s ilk.

ReadWriteWeb has what seemed to start out as a much-needed (in my opinion) examination of the necessity of all these services, but it ended up being a recommendation for where FriendFeed should end up and how it could be more useful. I’ll tell you how it could be more useful—by not being necessary. I naturally gravitate towards wanting to know as much as possible about as much as possible. I love to figure out how things work and learn new skills. But my brain is crying “Uncle!”, and I don’t even have a FaceBook, MySpace, or Twitter account. It almost seems as if we are creating information merely for the sake of creating new ways to share and manage it.

The irony of actually blogging about this does not escape me. There is great appeal on both sides of the equation—sharing information about oneself and digesting information about others. What I’m calling for is a little perspective. Do I really need four websites to let people know that I think the new Panic at the Disco single is HAWT? (For clarity’s sake, I couldn’t name a PatD song if even if caught in a panic at a disco.) I’m hopeful that this perspective is being forced on us by economic reality—apparently even the mighty Google cannot find a way to capitalize on millions of pageviews per month on MySpace. Bubbles seem to be the theme of the 2000s so far, and I’m thinking we’re at the edge of a social site bubble. The good news is that bursting this bubble will really only hurt the extreme narcissists and possibly a few venture capitalists. And I’m guessing there might even be a little overlap there.

Comments

Anuus Rafsanjani | 30 Jun 2008 | 5:41 PM

I go back and forth between thinking it’s a ridiculous fad and part of a generational shift where knowing exactly what every person you have ever met is doing at that particular moment becomes critically important.

On the whole I say it’s a fad.

Adam's avatarAdam | 30 Jun 2008 | 5:49 PM

Yeah, it’s tough to get perspective on it. I agree that it skews towards fad, at least at the current perceived level of importance. I think we need to figure out where to draw the line and learn ways to make this new incredible amount of info work for us, rather than overwhelm us.

Anuus Rafsanjani | 1 Jul 2008 | 11:52 AM

It reminds me of the mania for colonic irrigation that hit my native country 5 years ago--people who I never would have suspected were susceptible to fads dove in with a gusto, and before you knew it there were unqualified and unlicensed operators popping up on every street corner.

alwx | 28 Jul 2008 | 2:10 PM

Really great blog with alot of good information!! Keep up the good work.

Web Development | 5 Aug 2008 | 10:32 PM

Interesting post and very informative!

Add your comments


Also in this section